PORTFOLIOINDEX.json
{
"date": "2026-10-29",
"scope": "Navigation and visibility snapshot; not clinical or legal certification",
"projects": [
{
"repo": "Premedical-Educational-Portfolio-Critical-Care-Physiology",
"title": "Critical care physiology",
"kind": "Clinical learning",
"entry": "CTICU_PROCEDURE_EXAMPLES.md",
"evidence": "EVIDENCE_CLASSIFICATION.md",
"description": "Worked ICU and CTICU cases connect physiology, investigations, clinical reasoning and reassessment.",
"focus": "General knowledge, guideline recommendations and case-specific choices are labelled separately.",
"boundary": "Wholly synthetic cases; no patient-care or clinical-validation claim.",
"private": false
},
{
"repo": "Breast-Reconstruction-Analgesia-Review",
"title": "Breast reconstruction analgesia",
"kind": "Evidence review",
"entry": "George-BreastRecon-Review-v8.md",
"evidence": "REFERENCE_AUDIT.md",
"description": "A narrative literature review with reference-identity records, search diagnostics and interpretation notes.",
"focus": "Study populations, outcome interpretation and the limits of comparisons across evidence.",
"boundary": "Narrative educational analysis; selected source checks do not establish a systematic review.",
"private": false
},
{
"repo": "Smart-NOA-Controller",
"title": "Smart NOA simulation",
"kind": "Software simulation",
"entry": "GUIDELINE_INFORMED_EXAMPLES.md",
"evidence": "DEVELOPMENT.md",
"description": "A Python rule-checking simulation with fictional profiles, reproducible traces and documented limits.",
"focus": "Implemented behavior, unit arithmetic and the distinction between software checks and clinical safety.",
"boundary": "In-memory simulation with no patient, monitor or pump interface; not clinically validated.",
"private": false
},
{
"repo": "non-opioid-anesthesia-narrative-review",
"title": "Non-opioid and opioid-sparing anesthesia",
"kind": "Evidence review",
"entry": "MANUSCRIPT.md",
"evidence": "EVIDENCE_AUDIT.md",
"description": "A selected-source educational overview with a correction record and paired case discussions.",
"focus": "Review scope, claim-to-source reasoning and correction of unsupported historical claims.",
"boundary": "Educational overview; historical review-method and efficacy claims were withdrawn.",
"private": false
},
{
"repo": "tka-perioperative-review",
"title": "TKA perioperative analgesia",
"kind": "Evidence review",
"entry": "George-TKA-Scoping-Review-v2.md",
"evidence": "PUBLICATION_REVIEW.md",
"description": "A narrative evidence map with regional anesthesia, recovery and synthetic case material.",
"focus": "Evidence populations, recovery outcomes and the limits of screening, extraction and pooling claims.",
"boundary": "The retained filename says Scoping-Review; the current work is a selected-source narrative map.",
"private": false
},
{
"repo": "Breast-Reconstruction-Anesthesia-Protocol",
"title": "Breast perioperative learning",
"kind": "Clinical learning",
"entry": "APPLIED_CASES.md",
"evidence": "PUBLICATION_REVIEW.md",
"description": "Perioperative learning modules and paired synthetic cases with source and applicability notes.",
"focus": "Patient factors, anesthesia options and reassessment in an educational case format.",
"boundary": "The repository name retains Protocol; the revised material is educational discussion.",
"private": false
},
{
"repo": "rTKA-Multimodal-Anesthesia-Protocol",
"title": "Robot-assisted TKA working material",
"kind": "Private working draft",
"entry": "APPLIED_CASES.md",
"evidence": "README.md",
"description": "Private working material with a synthetic case supplement.",
"focus": "Separate added teaching examples from legacy clinical claims.",
"boundary": "Legacy claims require separate substantive review. Kept private.",
"private": true
},
{
"repo": "ai-anesthesiology-safety-framework",
"title": "AI anesthesiology safety working material",
"kind": "Private working draft",
"entry": "APPLIED_CASES.md",
"evidence": "README.md",
"description": "Private conceptual working material with hypothetical cases.",
"focus": "Separate conceptual discussion from an implemented or validated clinical system.",
"boundary": "Legacy claims require separate substantive review. Kept private.",
"private": true
},
{
"repo": "MCAT",
"title": "MCAT study app",
"kind": "Study tools",
"entry": "https://collingeorge.github.io/MCAT/",
"evidence": "docs/AUDIT-2026-10-28.md",
"description": "Browser-based recall practice, passages and timed practice exams.",
"boundary": "Independent study aid; not AAMC-endorsed. App score estimates do not predict official results.",
"private": false
}
]
}